Article 48
It would seem that the Mail uses a copyright symbol as some kinda shorthand attribution tag. I'm calling it 'lazy' over 'malicious'
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
Not m,ine. The cat's in a box, sealed, with a vial of bromide gas.
View ArticleRe: Re:
OMG, that list is a riot, it was way too long for me to go through the whole thing, but this one pretty much puts everything in perspective when talking about the Daily Mail, from this article claiming...
View ArticleKopyRight...
Does anyone doubt AP would claim copyright on PD materials? I don't! I don't understand why there hasn't been a "gold rush" on PD materials. Cheating & Stealing seems to be a valid enough business...
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
Depends. But a more interesting question would be: Dog sees cat: Will the cat bark?
View ArticleRe: KopyRight...
Does anyone doubt AP would claim copyright on PD materials? I actually have a significant doubt over whether the AP would charge a reprint fee to license a work of the United States Government to...
View ArticleRe: Knows to be false
That would appear to be the US code, not the UK code. I wonder if there's something similar in the UK? No time to check myself unfortunately.
View ArticleRe: Re: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
What did you do to the cat? It looks half-dead.
View ArticleTakedown
I'm just waiting for Mike to get the notice that he has to remove these copyrighted photos
View ArticleWho actually took the Atlantis picture?
NASA Johnson Space Center STS-135 Image Gallery (photo #20) (full size) captions this image as: Image Credit: NASA Does that indicate that the photo was actually taken by an employee of the United...
View ArticleRe: Re: Knows to be false
... US code, not the UK code.... Associated Press is U.S. That's why I was silently ignoring the Daily Mail.
View ArticleArticle 31
I'm beginning to wonder if the photo editors at the Daily Mail are just clueless, and think that a copyright symbol like that is the way you acknowledge where you found something.I think you're onto...
View ArticleRe: Who actually took the Atlantis picture?
It indicates that NASA is the original source of the photo (ie. taken by a NASA employee). NASA images, unless otherwise noted, are not copyright protected. It is unlawful to claim copyright on those...
View ArticleArticle 26
The Daily Mail (like most of the UK establishment) is a bit behind the curve when it comes to tech issues. I mean, look at this article, published this year, where they wax lyrical about pictures that...
View ArticleRe: Re: "whipped up mass hysteria over nothing"
I, for one, was truly whipped into a mass hysteria, dashing about and doing "jazz hands" in the air. There was no one else nearby, but considering my massive girth, I'd say that qualifies as "mass"...
View ArticleRe: Re: Images available for sale from AP in US
Are NASA pictures automatically put into the Public Domain? If so, how does this mechanism work because IIRC other artists were having issues trying to do this (put their works in the PD) themselves in...
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
In the same news, out_of_the_blue barks at blog.
View Articletrolls, trolls, trolls
Reminds me of patent trolls, one of the latest in (authorized by law) criminal scams where anyone can be sued by one of the plethora of patent scam artists operating out dummy/front/empty offices in...
View ArticleRe: Is it just Legal paranoia ?
- Not to nitpick, but there is no such thing as a "copyright attribution." Whether you put a notice on something or not, it is still infringing if you don't have a license. And once you have a license,...
View ArticleArticle 16
Mike, I think you have to remember a few things here: 1 - in posting on Youtube, you haven't made anything public domain. Rather, the rights holder has granted youtube a license to use the content on...
View ArticleRe:
Mike, I think you have to remember a few things here: ...blah blah blah... The thing is, Mike didn't say the things you're so desperately trying to make it look like he did. Typical copyright shill....
View ArticleRe:
Only if you have enough money to prove your ownership though. Little guys that publish without much money? Well clearly their content was supposed to be owned by someone with more cash on hand so they...
View ArticleRe: Re:
No, but the point is that Noe Castillo, or (his/her) reps can resell the rights to the AP. The can cede all print rights to the AP, and give them copyright control over the still images. Mike is making...
View ArticleRe:
1 - in posting on Youtube, you haven't made anything public domain. Rather, the rights holder has granted youtube a license to use the content on their site. The copyright remains with the original...
View ArticleRe: Re: Re:
But we are not shocked that every every one of your accusations is completely incorrect. It's like you purposefully misunderstood every word Mike typed. Bizarre.
View ArticleRe: Re: Re:
No, but the point is that Noe Castillo, or (his/her) reps can resell the rights to the AP. The can cede all print rights to the AP, and give them copyright control over the still images. You appear to...
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
I do wonder if the dog will bark? Trolls like you certainly do.
View ArticleRe:
I could go on. Sure, we not gonna stop you from making yourself look like a fool in public.
View ArticleRe: Re: Copyright on an image
You have created a derivative work - but the original copyright still applies because your modifications are not sufficiently transformative. I'm sure that in AP convoluted logic, they think that by...
View ArticleRe: Re:
Oh god, do you ever get over your bad self? 3. Video rights / still image rights. When someone creates a work, they can (and often do) split the rights. They can sell all still image rights to one...
View ArticleRe: Re: Re:
Please. Why would the guy have given still photo rights to YouTube of all things? That makes no sense whatsoever. As for the other shot... you think an astronaut aboard the ISS was somehow able to...
View ArticleRe: Re: Re:
3. Video rights / still image rights. When someone creates a work, they can (and often do) split the rights. They can sell all still image rights to one group (giving them legit copyright over the...
View ArticleNASA to AP
NASA shots are public domain. Period. You can't get an exclusive on them.Actually, NASA shots are copyrighted by NASA.
View Article
